Energy efficient construction is booming, driven by higher fuel prices, record-setting temperatures, and more stringent energy codes. Contractors are pushed to find better solutions for the building envelope.
While R-values have been the traditional measure of energy effectiveness, evidence now points to other factors that contribute equally to energy efficiency. This is the rest of the story – the story of the ICF Effect.
The R-value measurement came about in response to the oil crisis in the 1970’s. Up until then, fuel was cheap, and minimal attention was placed on energy use, as evidenced by the lack of insulation in mid-century homes. The skyrocketing fuel prices triggered a need for immediate improvements in residential energy efficiency. Minimum insulation values were prescribed as a quick and immediate remedy.
The values were based on the insulation materials typically used at the time. The existing hot box testing method, measured resistance of heat flow, or R-value.
The R-value testing measures the resistance to heat flow of a given material, in a steady state. While not an ideal representation of real world conditions, the R-value provides a straightforward system for comparing insulation materials.
As builders adapted new insulation materials and the HVAC industry developed more precise equipment sizing software, one thing became quite apparent: R-value alone does not reflect the actual effectiveness of a material when installed. If it did, then a wood frame house with an R-19 fiberglass batt would have the same energy performance as an Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) house with R-19 polystyrene foam, all other parts being equal.
However, houses built with ICF exterior walls typically require 44% less energy to heat and 32% less energy to cool than comparable frame houses. What’s the difference?
The R-value of a material is based on laboratory testing of a sample piece. It does not take into account gaps or variations in thickness. In real life, the R-value of an installed wall assembly should be a weighted average of all the wall components. For example, fiberglass batt (R-13), wood studs (R-4.38 for a 2×4), and air gaps (R-0 zero). In this case, the combined R- value is less than the tested value of the insulation component.
By comparison, the R-value of ICFs is constant. The foam form and its associated R-value is continuous by necessity as a forming system. For example, an R-22 ICF system performs at a true R-22 level.
Over half the energy loss of a frame home is due to unwanted air infiltration and heat loss through the wall assembly. Air can penetrate into a building through many channels – sheathing gaps, penetrations at balconies or cantilevered floors, and insulation gaps in the wall cavity.
Also, humidity and drying of the wood frame causes movement in the wood framing and contributes to post-construction leakage. Air infiltration coming from these gaps is typically around .5 ACH (air changes per hour), which means that each hour, half the air volume of a house is exchanged for outside air that needs to be heated/ cooled.
The ICF Effect
The energy effectiveness of an ICF wall is due to three important factors:
- Continuous R-value,
- Reduced air infiltration,
- Thermal mass moderation.
Energy Savings from the ICF R-Value
There are several ways to combat air infiltration. Choosing blown-in or spray-on insulation can help reduce the air gaps around the wood studs. However, no amount of blown in insulation will address the thermal bridging caused by the lower R-value wood framing.
Insulating Concrete Forms (ICFs) provide a ready solution to these issues. The monolithic concrete core forms an air tight barrier, with penetrations (e.g. windows and doors) which are easy to identify and seal. And, the time has no impact on these materials. The foam has a consistent R-value for the full-service life of the wall.
The benefits of thermal mass have been enjoyed in practice for centuries. Recently, the scientific community has also quantified and validated this effect. Studies conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) confirmed that concrete mass in exterior walls reduces annual energy costs in buildings. In 1987, this was written into the energy code in the form of reduced R-value requirements for a thermal mass wall assembly.
The ICF concrete core offers the characteristic thermal mass qualities of heat absorption and thermal lag. The additional insulation of an ICF wall further delays the transfer of heat to the inside of the building. This combination serves to reduce and delay peak loads, which may result in lower off-peak energy pricing and reduced HVAC equipment size. In climates with large diurnal temperatures swings, the mass wall can release absorbed heat energy to the cooler night air, a process called heat flow reversal.
This insulated thermal mass application provides an excellent pairing with passive solar design. The ICF wall moderates indoor temperature swings and reduces the amount of heating/ cooling needed. This in turn reduces the amount of exposed thermal mass needed for passive solar heating. Mass floors, interior walls, and other surfaces can meet this exposed mass requirement.
“The new ENERGY STAR Qualified Homes specification effectively levels the playing field between framed construction and advanced wall systems like insulated concrete forms. This is because complete air barrier assemblies that have been often missing in framed construction, but standard with advanced wall systems, are now required in every labeled home.”
Energy efficient construction is a top priority for the construction industry. The Energy Star for Homes program has experienced a sizeable increase in builder participation. The guidelines call for a continuous thermal envelope and a tighter air barrier requirements, which are the very strengths of ICFs. The Thermal Bypass Checklist even lists ICFs as a best practices solution for reduced thermal bridging.
ICFs can help provide this solution.
It’s time to look beyond the R-value and learn the rest of the story. Insulating Concrete Form construction offers a complete energy solution that makes economic sense today while helping to meet the energy needs of future generations.
i am having a design issue with an architect. do we need a vapour barrier or and air barrier on an ICF wall in commercial construction. the inside is drywall and the exterior is prefinished wood siding on vertical stapping. I cant seem to find the answer in the ontario building code
You do not need vapour barrier on ICF walls.
So what is the true R value of ICF.. is it R22 from what I can tell Southern Ontario building code requires minimum of R40. Is there ICF with R40
i wanna build a house with 30ft.width x 42 ft.length.bungalow with 3br,2 fullbath,attic roof.raised floor 3′ or 4’from the ground.(no basement)how much gonna cost me?
Please read the following: https://buildersontario.com/house-southern-ontario-cost-square-foot
However, houses built with ICF exterior walls typically require 44% less energy to heat and 32% less energy to cool than comparable frame houses.2 What is the difference? We call it the ICF Effect. The energy effectiveness of an ICF wall, the ICF Effect, is due to three important factors: continuous R-value, reduced air infiltration, and thermal mass